| Name of appraisee: | Page 2 | |||||
| Emp ID: | ||||||
| Key Result Objective | Measurement Criteria | Weightage (90%) | Self-appraisal by Appraisee (should be only in the form of achievements, challenges, roadblocks etc. Scores are not permitted) | Appraiser's comments, observations and feedback | Score given by Appraiser on KRO (1 - 5 scale) | Total / weighted score on KRO (Weightage X score given by Appraiser) |
| SVL% | Internal target to be met for all processes | 20% | 5 | 5 | 100 | |
| Abn% | internal target to be met for all processes | 10% | 5 | 4 | 40 | |
| Schedule Adherence | Late Login, Roster not adhere and Early Logout | 30% | 4 | 3 | 90 | |
| Intraday reports | 100% deviation to be captured at interval level, in case of not meeting the targets, with a drill down of why the target was missed on magic ratios. | 5% | 5 | 4 | 20 | |
| Aux % | 12% of the scheduled hours to be used | 20% | 4 | 3 | 60 | |
| Voice of the internal customers | Floor Management, Break management, Coordination. | 5% | 5 | 4 | 20 | |
| Initiatives | 2 initiatives=100%. Every initiative should have a cost benefit or performance enhancement vetted by manager. | 10% | 4 | 3 | 30 | |
| 0 | ||||||
| TOTAL WEIGHTAGE | 100% | TOTAL SCORE ON KROs | 360 | |||
| Signature of Appraisee | Signature of Appraiser | Signature of Reviewer | ||||
| Page 3 | ||||||
| Competency critical to role | Measurement Criteria | Weightage (10%) | Self-appraisal by Appraisee (should be only in the form of achievements, challenges, roadblocks etc. Scores are not permitted) | Appraiser's comments, observations and feedback | Score given by Appraiser on Competency (1 - 5 scale; Refer to BARS) | Total / weighted score on Competency (Weightage X score given by Appraiser) |
| Planning | 20% | Acht Management in Haryana prepaid /Reduce non adherence Percentage /Maintaining Aux Dashbord haryana Preapid ,gurukul and postpaid./ to cheack calls and staff time agent wise./Marketing of WFM Portal./feadback given to agents daily basis regarding there AUX. | 2 | 40 | ||
| Initiative and Commitment to Achieve | 20% | Inititaive taken on reduced ACHT And non Adherence Percentage | 2 | 40 | ||
| Customer Focus | 20% | Dailly met with TM's regarding there AUX ,ACHT and Non Adherence Percentage. | 2 | 40 | ||
| People Management | 20% | never be rude to anyone, always respect my seniors and all the support staff in entire mohali building. | 2 | 40 | ||
| Team Leading | 20% | Leading all the RTM's mohali. Taking the team meet once in week & tell them to update all the reports on time with zero error and with100% accuracy. | 1 | 20 | ||
| TOTAL WEIGHTAGE | 100% | TOTAL SCORE ON COMPETENCY | 180 | |||
| TOTAL PERFORMANCE SCORE (KRO SCORE + COMPETENCY SCORE) | 342 | |||||
| PERFORMANCE RATING CORRESPONDING TO TOTAL PERFORMANCE SCORE | GOOD | |||||
| Performance Strengths of the Appraisee (To be filled by the Appraiser) | Areas for Development (To be filled by the Appraiser) | |||||
| DECLARATION: | The points mentioned in the form have been discussed with the reviewer and agreed upon by the Appraisee, Appraiser and Reviewer | |||||
| Signature of Appraisee | Signature of Appraiser | Signature of Reviewer | ||||
Showing posts with label kro file format. Show all posts
Showing posts with label kro file format. Show all posts
Thursday, June 5, 2014
KRO file format page 2 inbound bpo
KRO file format page 1 - inbound bpo
| KRO / COMPETENCY SETTING AND APPRAISAL FORM | ||||
| Page 1 | ||||
| GRADE: | Band-5 | |||
| Period for which appraisal is being done: | Apr-10 to Sep 10 | Date: | 14-Oct-10 | |
| Name of appraisee: | Emp ID: | |||
| Process / Function: | Date of joining: | 5-Nov-07 | ||
| Appraisee's designation: | Appraisee's grade: | Band-5 | ||
| Name of Appraiser: | Appraiser's grade: | Band-4 | ||
| Name of Reviewer: | Reviewer's grade: | Band-3 | ||
| Guidelines for appraisals: | ||||
| 1. Please evaluate performance of the appraisee against KROs & Competencies that were set and agreed upon | ||||
| 2. Please be specific and objective in evaluating performance. This should be done based on measurement criteria that was set. | ||||
| 3. Provide feedback to the appraisee on KROs and Competencies. Support feedback with specific instances and concrete examples. | ||||
| 4. Encourage the appraisee to discuss his achievements and challenges. | ||||
| 5. Self-appraisal should not be done in the form of scores. It should elaborate the appraisee's achievements, challenges, roadblocks etc., | ||||
| 6. Additional sheets can be attached for self-appraisal and appraiser comments. These must be tagged and signed. | ||||
| 7. Score each KRO and Competency on a 1 - 5 scale. BARS must be refered to for competency evaluation. | ||||
| 8. Discuss all points with the Reviewer and arrive at a Final Score. | ||||
| 9.Communicate rating to the appraisee only post Reviewer approval of rating. | ||||
| 10.Submit print out of form with signatures to HR. | ||||
| Rating Scale | ||||
| Performance Score (KRO score + Competency score) | Corresponding Rating | |||
| 451 - 500 | EXCEPTIONAL | |||
| 336 - 450 | GOOD | |||
| 250 - 335 | REASONABLE | |||
| Less than 250 | POOR |
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)